Lightweight concurrency is a key feature of Wren and it is expressed using fibers. They control how all code is executed, and take the place of exceptions in error handling.
Fibers are a bit like threads except they are cooperatively scheduled. That means Wren doesn’t pause one fiber and switch to another until you tell it to. You don’t have to worry about context switches at random times and all of the headaches those cause.
Wren takes care of all of the fibers in the VM, so they don’t use OS thread resources, or require heavyweight context switches. Each just needs a bit of memory for its stack. A fiber will get garbage collected like any other object when not referenced any more, so you can create them freely.
They are lightweight enough that you can, for example, have a separate fiber for each entity in a game. Wren can handle thousands of them without breaking a sweat. For example, when you run Wren in interactive mode, it creates a new fiber for every line of code you type in.
All Wren code runs within the context of a fiber. When you first start a Wren script, a main fiber is created for you automatically. You can spawn new fibers using the Fiber class’s constructor:
var fiber = Fiber.new { System.print("This runs in a separate fiber.") }
It takes a function containing the code the fiber should execute. The function can take zero or one parameter, but no more than that. Creating the fiber does not immediately run it. It just wraps the function and sits there, waiting to be activated.
Once you’ve created a fiber, you run it by calling its call()
method:
fiber.call()
This suspends the current fiber and executes the called one until it reaches the end of its body or until it passes control to yet another fiber. If it reaches the end of its body, it is considered done:
var fiber = Fiber.new { System.print("It's alive!") } System.print(fiber.isDone) //> false fiber.call() //> It's alive! System.print(fiber.isDone) //> true
When a called fiber finishes, it automatically passes control back to the fiber that called it. It’s a runtime error to try to call a fiber that is already done.
The main difference between fibers and functions is that a fiber can be suspended in the middle of its operation and then resumed later. Calling another fiber is one way to suspend a fiber, but that’s more or less the same as one function calling another.
Things get interesting when a fiber yields. A yielded fiber passes control back to the fiber that ran it, but remembers where it is. The next time the fiber is called, it picks up right where it left off and keeps going.
You make a fiber yield by calling the static yield()
method on Fiber:
var fiber = Fiber.new { System.print("Before yield") Fiber.yield() System.print("Resumed") } System.print("Before call") //> Before call fiber.call() //> Before yield System.print("Calling again") //> Calling again fiber.call() //> Resumed System.print("All done") //> All done
Note that even though this program uses concurrency, it is still deterministic. You can reason precisely about what it’s doing and aren’t at the mercy of a thread scheduler playing Russian roulette with your code.
Calling and yielding fibers is used for passing control, but it can also pass data. When you call a fiber, you can optionally pass a value to it.
If you create a fiber using a function that takes a parameter, you can pass a
value to it through call()
:
var fiber = Fiber.new {|param| System.print(param) } fiber.call("Here you go") //> Here you go
If the fiber has yielded and is waiting to resume, the value you pass to call
becomes the return value of the yield()
call when it resumes:
var fiber = Fiber.new {|param| System.print(param) var result = Fiber.yield() System.print(result) } fiber.call("First") //> First fiber.call("Second") //> Second
Fibers can also pass values back when they yield. If you pass an argument to
yield()
, that will become the return value of the call()
that was used to
invoke the fiber:
var fiber = Fiber.new { Fiber.yield("Reply") } System.print(fiber.call()) //> Reply
This is sort of like how a function call may return a value, except that a fiber may return a whole sequence of values, one every time it yields.
What we’ve seen so far is very similar to what you can do with languages like Python and C# that have generators. Those let you define a function call that you can suspend and resume. When using the function, it appears like a sequence you can iterate over.
Wren’s fibers can do that, but they can do much more. Like Lua, they are full coroutines—they can suspend from anywhere in the callstack. The function you use to create a fiber can call a method that calls another method that calls some third method which finally calls yield. When that happens, all of those method calls — the entire callstack — gets suspended. For example:
var fiber = Fiber.new { (1..10).each {|i| Fiber.yield(i) } }
Here, we’re calling yield()
from within a function being
passed to the each()
method. This works fine in Wren because that inner
yield()
call will suspend the call to each()
and the function passed to it
as a callback.
Fibers have one more trick up their sleeves. When you execute a fiber using
call()
, the fiber tracks which fiber it will return to when it yields. This
lets you build up a chain of fiber calls that will eventually unwind back to
the main fiber when all of the called ones yield or finish.
This is usually what you want. But if you’re doing something low level, like writing your own scheduler to manage a pool of fibers, you may not want to treat them explicitly like a stack.
For rare cases like that, fibers also have a transfer()
method. This switches
execution to the transferred fiber and “forgets” the fiber that was transferred
from. The previous one is suspended, leaving it in whatever state it was in.
You can resume the previous fiber by explicitly transferring back to it, or even
calling it. If you don’t, execution stops when the last transferred fiber
returns.
Where call()
and yield()
are analogous to calling and returning from
functions, transfer()
works more like an unstructured goto. It lets you freely
switch control between a number of fibers, all of which act as peers to one
another.